Mapping Potensials and Problems to Improve Built Environment Quality in Maluk, Sumbawa Barat

Hanny Maria Caesarina; Randy Elfranda Natanael

doi:10.55756/omnicode.v4i2.199

Hanny Maria Caesarina Universitas Muhammadiyah Banjarmasin
Randy Elfranda Natanael Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Pengurus Daerah Kalimantan Selatan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55756/omnicode.v4i2.199

Keywords: Maluk, Participatory Rural Apraisal (PRA), built environment, Focus Group Discussion

Abstract

Maluk is a coastal area in Sumbawa Barat which is located next to industrial and smelter area. Due to this condition, Maluk has sustained some impacts in environment, socio-cultural aspects and local economy development. Hence, this community service aims to assist the local people of Maluk in mapping the potential and problems of their area. The method used was Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) which involves representatives from Mantun village, Pasir Putih village Maluk village, and Bukit Damai village. The result of this activity is the mapping of micro land use in Maluk. 93% of the participants stated the importance of improving their neighborhood. Some of the strategies offered are strengthening the role and involvement of local communities while at the same time utilizing the strategic position of the area by developing the trade and service sectors supported by the tourism sector.

References

Caesarina, H.M. (2020) ‘Green Space Conceptual Design for the Neighbourhood of Settlements along Martapura River in Banjarmasin’, Ruang, 6(1), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.6.1.1-10.

Caesarina, H.M. and Rahmani, D.R. (2019) ‘The Supervision of Built Environment and Green Space Data Collection for Village’s Profile in Semangat Bakti Village, Barito Kuala’, Comment: an International Journal of Community Development, 1(2), pp. 48–52.

Caesarina, H.M. and Rahmani, D.R. (2021) ‘Keterkaitan Permukiman Tepi Sungai dan Ruang Terbuka Hijau- Biru terhadap Kerentanan Bencana Banjir di Kota Kasongan Kalimantan Tengah’, in Perencanaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Berbasis Pengurangan Resiko Bencana. Seminar Nasional Plano Earth 2, Mataram: Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, pp. 88–92.

Deng, J., King, B. and Bauer, T. (2002) ‘Evaluating natural attractions for tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), pp. 422–438. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00068-8.

Michael, F.L., Noor, Z.Z. and Figueroa, M.J. (2014) ‘Review of urban sustainability indicators assessment–Case study between Asian countries’, Habitat International, 44, pp. 491–500.

Purnamawati, I.G.A., Nugraha, I. and Yuniarta, G.A. (2021) ‘Pentahelix Synergy Strengthening Model To Revival Sustainable Ecotourism in Bali Province’, International Journal of Business, Economic and Law, 24(4), pp. 76–83.

Sari, D.P., Caesarina, H.M. and Ridhoni, M. (2022) ‘Klasifikasi Wilayah Peri Urban Berdasarkan Aspek Fisik di Perbatasan Kabupaten Barito Kuala-Kota Banjarmasin (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Alalak)’, Uniplan: Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 3(2), p. 60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26418/uniplan.v3i2.57557.

Sentanu, I.G.E.P.S. et al. (2021) ‘Stakeholder collaboration model for ecotourism development in Indonesia: Case study from Batu City East Java Province’, Journal of Government and Civil Society, 5(2), pp. 214–236.

Suroija, N. et al. (2022) ‘Pentahelix Model For The Development Of Ecotourism Karang Ginger Beach Punjulharjo Village, Rembang Regency’, International Journal of Education, Business and Economics Research (IJEBER), 2(6), pp. 134–145.

Tambunan, T.S. (2020) ‘SWOT Analysis for Tourism Development Strategy of Samosir Regency’, TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 4(2), p. 90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/tijab.V4.I2.2020.90-105.

Yasir, Y. et al. (2021) ‘Penta helix communication model through community based tourism(CBT) for tourism village development in Koto Sentajo, Riau, Indonesia’, Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 37(3), pp. 851–860.

Yigitcanlar, T. and Dizdaroglu, D. (2015) ‘Ecological approaches in planning for sustainable cities: A review of the literature’, Global journal of environmental science and management, 1(2), pp. 159–188.